Skip to main content

Random walking our way to radiative diffusion

I just figured out how to insert LaTeX commands directly into Blogger! Check out these instructions for how to use MathJax.

In what follows is a piece of supplemental info for my Ay20 class. Since LaTeX stopped working on my office computer after my recent move across the street, this is the easiest way to get this info to my students...

Random Walks

A photon undergoing a random walk will travel a distance $l$ before suffering a "collision," which sends it off in a random direction. It seems counter intuitive, but this random walk process results in a net displacement. Read Astrophysics in a Nutshell, Chapter 3 pages 38-39 (starting with ``Thus, photons...'' and ending with equation 3.45. What you'll see is the expectation value for the mean displacement $\left<D\right>$ is
\begin{equation}
\left<D\right> = N^{\frac{1}{2}}l
\end{equation}
If we think of the distance $\Delta r$ as the net distance traveled, $\Delta r = \left<D\right>$, then each step in the random walk will take $t_{\rm step} = l/c$, and after N steps the total time to traverse $\Delta r$ will be
\begin{equation}
t_{\rm tot} = \frac{N l}{c}  = \frac{(\Delta r)^2}{l^2}\frac{l}{c} = \frac{(\Delta r)^2}{l c}
\end{equation}
It takes the photon this total time to traverse a distance $\Delta r$, so the diffusion speed is
\begin{equation}
v_{\rm diff} = \frac{\Delta r}{t_{\rm tot}}  = \frac{l}{\Delta r} c
\end{equation}
This is what I was trying to get you to derive using simple scaling arguments in problems 1 and 2 of this week's worksheet, but it occurred to me in class today that the students are unfamiliar with random walk processes. From here it should be pretty straight forward to derive the radiative diffusion equation for $dT/dr$.


Comments

Strakul said…
Nice! I had to do this once and ended up uploading screenshots...
The only bad thing here is that it doesn't show up properly in the RSS feed.

Popular posts from this blog

A view from your shut down

The Daily Dish has been posting reader emails reporting on their " view from the shutdown ." If you think this doesn't affect you, or if you know all too well how bad this is, take a look at the growing collection of poignant stories. No one is in this alone except for the nutjobs in the House. I decided to email Andrew with my own view. I plan to send a similar letter to my congressperson. Dear Andrew, I am a professor of astronomy at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA). The CfA houses one of the largest, if not the largest collection of PhD astronomers in the United States, with over 300 professional astronomers and roughly 100 doctoral and predoctoral students on a small campus a few blocks west of Harvard Yard. Under the umbrella of the CfA are about 20 Harvard astronomy professors, and 50 tenure-track Smithsonian researchers. A large fraction of the latter are civil servants currently on furlough and unable to come to work. In total, 147 FTEs

back-talk begins

me: "owen, come here. it's time to get a new diaper" him, sprinting down the hall with no pants on: "forget about it!" he's quoting benny the rabbit, a short-lived sesame street character who happens to be in his favorite "count with me" video. i'm turning my head, trying not to let him see me laugh, because his use and tone with the phrase are so spot-on.

The Long Con

Hiding in Plain Sight ESPN has a series of sports documentaries called 30 For 30. One of my favorites is called Broke  which is about how professional athletes often make tens of millions of dollars in their careers yet retire with nothing. One of the major "leaks" turns out to be con artists, who lure athletes into elaborate real estate schemes or business ventures. This naturally raises the question: In a tightly-knit social structure that is a sports team, how can con artists operate so effectively and extensively? The answer is quite simple: very few people taken in by con artists ever tell anyone what happened. Thus, con artists can operate out in the open with little fear of consequences because they are shielded by the collective silence of their victims. I can empathize with this. I've lost money in two different con schemes. One was when I was in college, and I received a phone call that I had won an all-expenses-paid trip to the Bahamas. All I needed to d